Next: The GRBM & BATSE
Up: Cross-Check with Other Catalogs
Previous: Cross-Check with Other Catalogs
  Contents
The number of well localized GRBs detected also by the GRBM amounts to
79; except for one GRB, namely the WFC GRB010304 already discussed in
section
, the arrival directions are known with
high accuracy, typically with few arcminutes uncertainties.
Out of 79 GRBs, 46 are in common with the WFCs aboard BeppoSAX;
actually, during the time interval scanned by the present GRBM off-line
quest, lasting from July 03, 1996 to October 03, 2001, the WFCs detected
52 GRBs; among these, 45 have been automatically caught, only 1
did not trigger any SWTCs: GRB990704, UT 17:30:20, to date
the most X-ray rich BeppoSAX burst ([Feroci et al., 2001]), and
it was thus recovered after recognition by visual inspection (this GRB
triggered the on-board logic). Another one, i.e. GRB000424, UT 18:18:07,
occurred when the GRBM had been already switched off owing to the SAGA;
the remaining 5 WFC GRBs show no clear signal in the GRBM energy bands, in
agreement with their classification as X-ray rich GRBs: GRB990520, GRB991106,
GRB991617, GRB000416, and GRB000608.
The number of bursts localized with the only IPN and detected by the off-line
quest within the GRBM data amounts to 20; nevertheless, the GRBM did not
contribute to the prompt localization of all, because its data were sometimes
not immediately available (when the on-line quest has not been operating,
owing to the problems already discussed in the previous chapter).
For a discussion of the only IPN GRBs, that have been on-line discovered by
the GRBM, see section
.
The remaining 13 well localized bursts have been positioned by the following
experiments: 7 by ASM, 2 by the PCA/Rossi-XTE in combination with BATSE
(GRB990506, also triangulated by the IPN, and GRB991216), 1 by the two
CGRO experiments COMPTEL and BATSE (GRB980706), and 3 by HETE-II
(GRB010326, and two refined with the IPN: GRB010612, GRB010629).
The situation is summarized in table
.
Table:
Well Localized GRBs detected by the GRBM
Experiment(s) |
# GRBM |
# on-board |
# off-line |
|
GRBs |
trg GRBs (%) |
missed GRBs |
WFCs |
46 |
27 ( ) |
1 |
IPN |
20 |
17 ( ) |
0 |
ASM |
7 |
4 ( ) |
0 |
PCA+BATSE |
2 |
2 (100) |
0 |
COMPTEL+BATSE |
1 |
1 (100) |
0 |
HETE-II |
3 |
3 (100) |
0 |
Total |
78 |
54 ( ) |
1 |
In this table, there is one value,
that is worth mentioning: the fraction (
%) of GRBs
that triggered the on-board logic; this is perfectly consistent with
the estimate of the on-board trigger efficiency expressed in
eq.
(
%). Also the single subsets
of GRBs show consistent fractions, although the statistical significance
is low, owing to the small numbers.
Once again, the on-board trigger efficiency comes out to be
2/3.
Next: The GRBM & BATSE
Up: Cross-Check with Other Catalogs
Previous: Cross-Check with Other Catalogs
  Contents
Cristiano Guidorzi
2003-07-31