To date, only four SGRs are known and all have been located
within supernova remnants (SNRs),
suggesting that they should be young neutron stars (age y).
Among these, only SGR0525-66, responsible for the energetic
outburst of March 5, 1979 ([Mazets et al., 1979b,Cline et al., 1980]),
is associated with the N49 remnant in the Large Magellanic Cloud,
while the other SGRs lie within galactic SNRs
(SGR1900+14, SGR1806-20 and SGR1627-41).
There is also a likely fifth source, discovered in 1997, SGR1801-23
([Cline et al., 2000]), but its position has not yet been determined
accurately enough to investigate its possible association with a SNR.
When active, SGRs typically emit short (0.1 s)
very bright bursts recurring
on different timescales of seconds to years, with typical energies
of
ergs.
Rarely, they undergo dramatic instabilities producing long and
giant hard X- and soft
-ray flares, reaching
erg/s.
Three SGRs have quiescent X-ray counterparts with luminosities
of
-
erg/s.
Recently, observations of the persistent soft X-ray counterparts
have shown periodicities of 5-8 s and spin-down rates of
s/s ([Kouveliotou et al., 1998,Kouveliotou et al., 1999]).
Basically, SGR bursts are different from Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs)
as for many properties: first, they undergo repeated periods of intense
activity; second, their spectra are softer than GRBs and they are
well fitted by a thermal bremsstrahlung with
between 20 and 40 keV.
Before April 2001, only two giant flares had been detected, namely the 1979 March 5 from SGR0525-66 and the 1998 August 27 from SGR1900+14 ([Feroci et al., 1999a,Feroci et al., 2001b,Hurley et al., 1999c,Mazets et al., 1999]); the latter was responsible for the most intense radiation flux ever detected from a source located outside Solar System: actually, it affected the Earth's ionosphere ([Inan et al., 1999]).
The theoretical model known as the ``magnetar'' model
([Duncan & Thompson, 1992], Paczynski, 1992, [Thompson & Duncan, 1995]) considers a young
neutron star with a very strong magnetic field (
G), whose decay powers both the quiescent X-ray emission
through heating of stellar interior and low-level seismic activity
and periodically causes big crustquakes triggering short bursts
(as well as giant flares).
Differently from this model, accounting for both burst and persistent
emission properties, models requiring accreting neutron stars with
G can only account for the quiescent emission,
while the hyper-Eddington bursts cannot be satisfactorily explained.
In particular, SGR1900+14 deserves our attention, since it produced two
giant flares, that have been detected with the GRBM: August 1998
and April 2001.
SGR1900+14 was discovered in 1979 following three bursts in two days
([Mazets et al., 1979a]). Localized by the IPN ([Hurley et al., 1999d]), it lies
close to the SNR G42.8+0.6, implying a proper motion of at least
1000 Km/s. After its discovery, the source was detected again in 1992
([Kouveliotou et al., 1993b]); after five years of quiescence, in May 1998
it entered an extremely active period, that reached its maximum with
the giant hard X- and -ray flare of August 27, 1998.
Observations of the quiescent soft X-ray counterpart ([Vasisht et al., 1994])
have shown a 5.16-s periodicity and an average spin-down rate
of s/s ([Kouveliotou et al., 1999,Hurley et al., 1999e]).
According to the magnetar model, this high spin-down rate is
induced by the breaking of the magnetic field, which therefore
must be very strong: B
G.
Its spectrum is well fitted by a constant blackbody component
(kT
keV) plus a power law, that varies between the two
different, i.e. quiescent and bursting, source states ([Woods et al., 1999]).