next up previous contents
Next: Final Number of GRBs Up: Classification of Off-line Triggers Previous: 10. False Events   Contents

Final Classification Results

Hereafter the tables reporting the results of the classification of the off-line triggers are given. These results have been classified, depending on the integration time (or rebin time) adopted for the off-line quest: 1 s, 2 s, 4 s, and 8 s. Among the events reported below, those detected by means of rebinned quests, i.e. with integration times $>$ 1 s, had not been detected with lower rebinning times: all the events that triggered more than one quest, have been computed only for the quest with the lowest rebin time: this fact explains why the 1 s quest has yielded the highest number of triggers (table [*]).


Table: Final Classification of off-line triggers
Transient Event Class Number (%) Number (%) Number (%) Number (%) Total (%)
  (1 s) (2 s) (4 s) (8 s) (merged)
GRBs 730 (39.9) 87 ( 8.1) 54 ( 5.5) 23 ( 5.9) 894 (21.0)
Likely GRBs 217 (11.9) 164 (15.3) 83 ( 8.5) 10 ( 2.6) 474 (11.1)
Suspected GRBs 671 (36.6) 512 (47.8) 346 (35.6) 11 ( 2.8) 1540 (36.1)
Solar X-ray Flares 72 ( 3.9) 27 ( 2.5) 38 ( 3.9) 37 ( 9.5) 174 ( 4.1)
SAGA 16 ( 0.9) 48 ( 4.5) 30 ( 3.1) 153 (39.4) 247 ( 5.8)
Occultation Events 3 ( 0.2) 11 ( 1.0) 100 (10.3) 101 (26.0) 215 ( 5.0)
Suspected TGFs 33 ( 1.8) 25 ( 2.3) 16 ( 1.6) 0 ( 0.0) 74 ( 1.7)
SGRs 1 ( 0.1) 2 ( 0.2) 1 ( 0.1) 0 ( 0.0) 4 ( 0.1)
Unkown 29 ( 1.6) 8 ( 0.7) 13 ( 1.3) 1 ( 0.3) 51 ( 1.2)
False 59 ( 3.2) 187 (17.5) 292 (30.0) 52 (13.4) 590 (13.8)
Total 1831 (100) 1071 (100) 973 (100) 388 (100) 4263 (100)

From a quick look of the results reported in table [*], some properties of each quest stand out: first of all, the 1 s quest has the highest fraction of GRBs ($\sim$ 40%), and this is quite easy to understand: actually, the strong GRBs, that triggered all quests, have been accounted for only in the 1 s results, thus leaving the weaker GRBs to the other quests; as these are more difficult to recognize, the samples of bursts collected with the other quests are proportionally smaller. Another interesting observation concerns the number of off-line triggered occultation events, as a function of the rebin time quest: while at low bin times (1 and 2 s) there is a few of them ($<$ 1%), at higher rebin times (4 and 8 s) this fraction rises to 10% and 26%, respectively. To some extent, the same observation is still true for the off-line triggered SAGA events; a possible explanation of this fact is that these background variations are strong enough to trigger the SWTCs only when high integration times are used.

Concerning the triggered solar hard X-ray flares, one remark is needed: the number of flares reported in table [*] is little higher than the real number of distinct flares automatically caught (see chapter 6): actually, it sometimes happened that the longest ones, with several hundreds seconds durations, have triggered the SWTCs several times, not only once: only after a visual inspection of the overall sample, it has been possible to limit this redundancy and to count the number of separate solar flares exactly.

In summary, out of 4263 total off-line triggers automatically collected by the samples (see the columns of table [*] at the right side), 894 (21%) have been classified as true GRBs. Among the remaining subsets, the Suspected GRBs class is the largest (36%); then, it comes out that 14% out of the total correspond to False Events, while a similar fraction (11%) describes the population of Likely GRBs. If the ratio between the number of off-line triggers that have been classified as GRBs over the total number of off-line triggers is used to define a sort of ``off-line quest reliability'' $R$, then it turns out that from $R \simeq 0.4$, for the only 1 s quest, the overall $R$ falls to $R \simeq 0.2$. This shows that the merging of multiple rebin quests has a worse reliability than the 1 s quest only (that is why in the on-line case this is the only quest working); on the other hand, the multiple rebin search allows to catch a greater number of faint, slow-varying, shallow GRBs, thus improving the search algorithms' sensitivity.


next up previous contents
Next: Final Number of GRBs Up: Classification of Off-line Triggers Previous: 10. False Events   Contents
Cristiano Guidorzi 2003-07-31